This is extremely useful because you're not going to end up with some weird surprises when you transfer files and start the editing process.
Smart shooter 4 vs capture one software#
There are areas where one software will best the otherl however, from an overall perspective, each of the two offers some extremely useful benefits.įor example, Lightroom will remain far closer to what you see on the back of the camera. It's difficult to say that one program is clearly better than the other, especially when you start doing more complex side-by-side comparisons.
Smart shooter 4 vs capture one skin#
However, in the Canon 5DS R image, Capture One produces a more natural look, with skin tones appearing less saturated in comparison to what Lightroom produced. For the Canon EOS R5, for example, the skirt appears as a more accurate red tone in the Lightroom file than it does in the Capture One file. Each software seems to manage files from each camera in a slightly different way. In the comparison above, the cameras I used were the Canon EOS R5, the Canon 5DS R, the Canon EOS R, and the Canon 5D Mark IV. Recovering highlights in Lightroom will likely affect a larger part of any given image. The software targets the highest points in an image without affecting the rest of the image. Having said that, Capture One offers a greater deal of precision when it comes to highlight recovery. Lightroom is far more generous in this regard, and for many kinds of work, it proves to be the more useful option. This is because Capture One is a little too reserved in how much of the overall spectrum it recovers. In my experience, I find highlight recovery in Capture One to be less useful in most circumstances. These examples are just here to demonstrate the extent to which each software allows when it comes to recovering highlights. In most cases, I tend not to recover highlights anywhere near this degree.
Essentially, the maximum setting on the sliders in each application has been used. In the image comparison above, the highlights have been fully recovered in each program. Each software seems to manage highlight recovery a little differently. Almost every kind of photography benefits from this. Recovering highlights in an image is obviously quite important. What you see on the back of the camera is going to be really close to what you see in Lightroom. The reason why this could be beneficial to many is that the look of the images when using Lightroom remains consistent. Once again, however, Lightroom seems to be leaning more towards how the original JPEGs look from Canon. The other two files seem to have a harsher look to them, and the lighting around the face seems less controlled. The file doesn't look harsh and has a more pleasing look. In my mind, Capture One does a better job at representing the lighting and skin tones. The other major difference between the files is how the lighting looks. I find that Capture One is a little too aggressive with how much sharpening it applies. Lightroom also does not apply as much sharpening compared to Capture One. Having said that, one could argue that Lightroom does a better job at remaining true to what Canon is aiming to produce with its cameras. However, personally, I find the processing from Capture One to be more appealing. This can be useful if you prefer to have a little more punch in the skin tones.
On the other hand, both the Lightroom and Canon JPEG lean a little more in the orange and magenta tones. For instance, the Capture One exported file appears less saturated and leans more into the earthy tones. Even if no adjustments are made to a file, images exported from different software will look distinctly different. When you export images from Capture One or Lightroom, each software will apply its own interpretations. Below we have the first comparison that we can take a look at. This is not a benchmark by any means, although it can serve as a point of reference to some degree. No adjustments have been made to this image. This first image that we're looking at is a JPEG file straight out of the Canon EOS R6. We will take a look at some of the other models from Canon too however, in order to accomplish a deeper dive, a single image should suffice. In this first of the series, we will be looking at Canon cameras, focusing primarily on an image taken with the Canon EOS R6 and the RF 50mm f/1.2 lens. For this reason, I'll be comparing both pieces of software with a wide range of camera manufacturers to determine which of the two is, in fact, the better option. As great as Lightroom can be when it comes to bulk editing, Capture One is described as being the better choice if you want to get the most out of your raw files. There is a common argument circulating that Capture One will produce better-looking files compared to Lightroom.
0 kommentar(er)
